Are there very rare cases of a character being removed from some moral scaling wiki and moved to another when a product of their story or franchise was removed from canon?

Im new on this wiki

So, I've been thinking William Furno from Hero Factory fits on "Pure Good", because if you think about, he's just trying to save people at all costs despite his impulsive behavior. He hardly has corrupting qualities in my opinion.

Now, Toa Gali from Bionicle is who I'm debating. She is trying to maintain peace with her Toa teammates although sometimes she CAN be bossy, I guess IDK. But she is wise and mellow. I'd say she is somewhere between Pure Good and Near Pure Good.

Amelie Poulain from the 2001 film of the same name, I think is either Inconsistently Admirable or Near Pure Good because she just wants to help people and make them happy, but she has a shy, introverted personality and it results in her helping them in an unorthodox way.

If anyone knows these characters, what do you guys think?

What do you think of the Archetype Wikis (i.e. Shonen Heroes, Shonen Rivals, etc.)?

Shonen Heroes

Shonen Rivals

What do i need to post a character?

What others "about moral ranking" pages should we have?

Why is there no ill-natured or good-natured wiki if every other moral ranking has it's own wiki?

Pure Good

• Maestro

• Mega Man

• Duo

Near Pure Good

• King

• Proto Man

• Guts Man

Inconsistently Admirable

• Bass

Heroic Benchmark

• Dr. Light

• Dr. Cossack

• Mr. X

Villainous Benchmark

• Genesis Unit

• Mega Man Killers

• Fake Man

Inconsistently Heinous

• Ra Moon/Ra Thor/Ra Devil

Near Pure Evil

• Dr. Wily

• Quint

• Copy Robot/Mega Man?

Pure Evil

• Terra

• Sunstar

• Evil Robot/Eclipse

Pure Good

• Shantae

Near Pure Good

• Rottytops

• Bolo

• Sky

Inconsistently Admirable

• Harmony

Heroic Benchmark

• Uncle Minic

• Mayor Scuttlebutt

Villainous Benchmark

• Squid Baron

• Techno Baron

• Hypno Baron

• Twitch And Vinegar

• Tinkerbats

Inconsistently Heinous

• Ammo Baron

Near Pure Evil

• Risky Boots

• Nega Shantae

Pure Evil

• The Pirate Master

• Empress Siren

Here is the extended version of the Alignment chart I made up. Lawful good - I am a kind and selfless person who always follows the rules. I save the day and show empathy to anyone who is sad. Peace is possible if we work together to make it happen. Lawful neutral - I am a person who lives by the rules. I don't care if the rule is peace or chaos. The law is the law. Lawful aggressive - I am usually I gentle person who puts others before myself. But don't break any rules in front of me. If you do I will rage and call the police on you. Rules and Laws must be followed. Lawful evil - I might be an evil person but I can't call myself a rule breaker. I have turned evil for a reason. I notice my actions could be doing more harm than good. Neutral good - I am generally a good person. I will try to do the right thing. However, I will do anything to be a good person even if that means breaking the rules. True neutral - I am neither evil nor good. I don't have a reaction to good vs evil decisions. I like my family and friends. I don't want to later regret my decision and than be unpopular. Neutral aggressive - I can be calm and help others. When you push me I get upset. To calm down you need to talk with the person why you are upset. Neutral evil - I only do what comes to mind. I can and will betray people for myself. Some people call me dangerous. Upset good - I am with the principles of good but may be driven by frustration or anger. I do a more aggressive approach in order for justice to be severed. Justice and fairness must always be severed. Upset Neutral - I am neutral in my actions. However, I am influenced by new emotions, discontent, or frustration. I may display a more aggressive demeanor in actions and my decision making. True Aggressive - I am a person who prioritizes assertiveness, action, and direct confrontation, regardless of their alignment. I may be proactive, forceful, and unyielding in order to achieve me goals. Violence is the answer. Upset evil - I am a evil person but is driven by negative emotions turmoil. I may cause more aggressive, chaotic, or destructive behavior to harm others. Everyone will pay for what they have done to me for turning me evil. Chaotic good - I am a good person who secretly likes to cause chaos. I do anything to save the day and be the hero. When chaos happens I watch it happen. Chaotic neutral - I am a neutral person who does whatever they want. It's like my parents and friends are the boss of me. I can take care of myself. Chaotic aggressive - I am a mean and aggressive person who has little regret and little empathy of my actions. When I see chaos I aggressively cause destitution there. The police are after me. Chaotic evil - I am a evil person who wants to do an evil plan. Heroes frequently interrupt and try to stop me. I cause major chaos by trying to take over a certain place and manipulated people. I turned evil because of greed, being a victim, or some evil reason. The police are going to lock me up to jail. I want to take over the world.

Firstly, I'm pretty new to the moral ranking wiki and moral ranking in general. I was looking through the classes of each moral ranking since most of them essentially explains why a character is within that specific ranking to begin with. And then I went to the page for inconsistently admirable and it says that they are three classes of inconsistently admirable heroes yet I only see two there, Class A and Class B. So I was wondering, what's the third class for inconsistently admirable heroes? Is there a third class to begin with and was it just a typo? Please clarify for me. Also, I think the inconsistently admirable page is the only ranking page with this problem.